How Do You Spell CIRCULAR ARGUMENT?

1. A circular argument is a logical fallacy wherein the conclusion of an argument is essentially restating the initial premise or assumption. It is a form of reasoning where the evidence or reasoning provided to support a statement simply reiterates or assumes the original statement to be true, creating a continuous loop.

   In a circular argument, instead of presenting new evidence or logical reasoning to establish the truth of a claim, the argument relies on the claim itself. This logical fallacy essentially assumes the conclusion before it is proven, thereby rendering the argument invalid. Circular arguments tend to create a false sense of validity, as they may appear logical, but upon closer examination, lack any substantive evidence or logical structure.

   By employing circular reasoning, individuals essentially create an infinite loop wherein no new information is introduced. This can hinder critical thinking and genuine discourse, as the argument becomes self-referential and fails to provide any meaningful insight or objective analysis. Circular arguments are often employed to support positions where legitimate evidence or reasoning is lacking or weak.

   Being aware of circular arguments is important for critical thinking and evaluation of logical reasoning. Recognizing this fallacy allows individuals to identify flawed arguments, challenge assumptions, and engage in constructive debates based on solid reasoning rather than circularity.

Common Misspellings for CIRCULAR ARGUMENT

The term "circular argument" is derived from the combination of the words "circular" and "argument".

The word "circular" originates from the Latin word "circulāris", which means "circular" or "round". In this context, it refers to something that goes in a circle or repetitively returns to its starting point.

The word "argument" comes from the Latin word "argumentum", which means "evidence" or "proof". It is the process of reasoning in order to convince or persuade others.

When we combine these two words, a "circular argument" refers to a type of argument in which the conclusion is included in the premises. In other words, it is a logical fallacy where the conclusion is assumed or presupposed within the initial statements and no real evidence or support is provided. It fundamentally goes in a circle without reaching a true resolution.

Plural form of CIRCULAR ARGUMENT is CIRCULAR ARGUMENTS